<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96458</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench&#039;s decision that in-shell almonds imported by the appellants did not qualify as seeds under the Import Control Policy. The court emphasized the specific criteria for seeds related to germination or plantation, stating that the almonds did not meet these requirements. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of compliance with import policies to receive benefits and clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96458</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench&#039;s decision that in-shell almonds imported by the appellants did not qualify as seeds under the Import Control Policy. The court emphasized the specific criteria for seeds related to germination or plantation, stating that the almonds did not meet these requirements. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of compliance with import policies to receive benefits and clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>