<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 414 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96456</link>
    <description>Shortage detected during stock taking did not, by itself, establish clandestine manufacture or removal without payment of duty. As the duty attributable to the shortage had already been paid in full, the record did not support maintaining the penalty at the level originally imposed. The penalty was therefore reduced to Rs. 10,000, while the remainder of the order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 414 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96456</link>
      <description>Shortage detected during stock taking did not, by itself, establish clandestine manufacture or removal without payment of duty. As the duty attributable to the shortage had already been paid in full, the record did not support maintaining the penalty at the level originally imposed. The penalty was therefore reduced to Rs. 10,000, while the remainder of the order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>