<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 343 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96416</link>
    <description>Pieces of cable removed from drums for mandatory quality control testing were held not to be excisable goods because the test was destructive and rendered the sample unusable. The Tribunal treated the testing as an integral contractual requirement rather than a separate process producing marketable goods, so no excise duty was payable on the destroyed cable pieces.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:38:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 343 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96416</link>
      <description>Pieces of cable removed from drums for mandatory quality control testing were held not to be excisable goods because the test was destructive and rendered the sample unusable. The Tribunal treated the testing as an integral contractual requirement rather than a separate process producing marketable goods, so no excise duty was payable on the destroyed cable pieces.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>