https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96390 A request to stay revocation of a Custom House Agent licence was rejected because the licensing framework was treated as operating separately at each customs station, and the revocation in question concerned only the Kandla licence while the Mumbai licence remained unaffected. The argument that business at all customs stations should be aggregated for assessing sufficiency of business was noted as having not been considered earlier and as warranting serious consideration, but it was not enough to justify interim relief. No sufficient ground was found to suspend the impugned order, and the stay application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:40:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96390 A request to stay revocation of a Custom House Agent licence was rejected because the licensing framework was treated as operating separately at each customs station, and the revocation in question concerned only the Kandla licence while the Mumbai licence remained unaffected. The argument that business at all customs stations should be aggregated for assessing sufficiency of business was noted as having not been considered earlier and as warranting serious consideration, but it was not enough to justify interim relief. No sufficient ground was found to suspend the impugned order, and the stay application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96390