https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96384 Honey received from apiaries and subjected only to heating, cooling, filtration and straining before packing was held not to be a branded ayurvedic medicine under Chapter Heading 3003.39. The use of "CHARAK" as a housemark on all products was not shown to be a brand name specifically adopted for the honey, and the product was not shown to be mentioned in any pharmacopoeia or to contain therapeutic or prophylactic ingredients. Its description as AGMARK grade natural honey did not establish that it was a special preparation or a branded patent or proprietary medicament, so classification under Chapter Heading 3003.39 was rejected. en-us Mon, 21 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:25:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96384 Honey received from apiaries and subjected only to heating, cooling, filtration and straining before packing was held not to be a branded ayurvedic medicine under Chapter Heading 3003.39. The use of "CHARAK" as a housemark on all products was not shown to be a brand name specifically adopted for the honey, and the product was not shown to be mentioned in any pharmacopoeia or to contain therapeutic or prophylactic ingredients. Its description as AGMARK grade natural honey did not establish that it was a special preparation or a branded patent or proprietary medicament, so classification under Chapter Heading 3003.39 was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96384