https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96322 The Settlement Commission allowed the Applicant's application to proceed despite ongoing prosecution proceedings, citing Section 32K's provision not barring admission based on pending prosecution for duty matters. The Commission exercised discretion under Section 32K to grant immunity from prosecution, penalties, fines, and interest, considering the case specifics. Legal precedents supported the acceptance of applications even if prosecution commenced earlier. The Commission directed the Applicant to pay admitted duty liability within a specified timeframe, emphasizing fair settlement practices and legal compliance. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:25:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96322 The Settlement Commission allowed the Applicant's application to proceed despite ongoing prosecution proceedings, citing Section 32K's provision not barring admission based on pending prosecution for duty matters. The Commission exercised discretion under Section 32K to grant immunity from prosecution, penalties, fines, and interest, considering the case specifics. Legal precedents supported the acceptance of applications even if prosecution commenced earlier. The Commission directed the Applicant to pay admitted duty liability within a specified timeframe, emphasizing fair settlement practices and legal compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96322