<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 482 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96320</link>
    <description>Non-supply of relied-upon documents in adjudication can vitiate the order where the appellant is denied a fair opportunity to meet the case. The importer had specifically sought the documents forming the basis of the demand, confiscation and penalty, but they were not furnished; the order was therefore set aside for breach of natural justice and remanded to the Commissioner for fresh disposal by a speaking order. The merits of the duty demand were not examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 482 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96320</link>
      <description>Non-supply of relied-upon documents in adjudication can vitiate the order where the appellant is denied a fair opportunity to meet the case. The importer had specifically sought the documents forming the basis of the demand, confiscation and penalty, but they were not furnished; the order was therefore set aside for breach of natural justice and remanded to the Commissioner for fresh disposal by a speaking order. The merits of the duty demand were not examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>