<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 480 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, a 100% EOU engaged in aqua culture, regarding the utilization of duty-free items. The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/95 and set aside the demand confirmed by the Commissioner, emphasizing the importance of interpreting notifications to uphold the rights of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 480 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, a 100% EOU engaged in aqua culture, regarding the utilization of duty-free items. The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/95 and set aside the demand confirmed by the Commissioner, emphasizing the importance of interpreting notifications to uphold the rights of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>