<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 570 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, MU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96311</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission allowed the application to proceed, accepted the adjustment of the duty amount deposited, and clarified the interpretation of Sections 35F and 32PA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commission emphasized excluding the day of the event triggering the application deadline when calculating the time limit, as per the General Clauses Act. Compliance with the Act was underscored for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 570 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, MU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96311</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission allowed the application to proceed, accepted the adjustment of the duty amount deposited, and clarified the interpretation of Sections 35F and 32PA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commission emphasized excluding the day of the event triggering the application deadline when calculating the time limit, as per the General Clauses Act. Compliance with the Act was underscored for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>