<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 582 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96301</link>
    <description>The commentary addresses whether Modvat credit could be extended on documents not prescribed under Rule 57G and whether that legal question warranted reference to the High Court. The stated outcome is that the matter was referred to the High Court for determination of the question of law, leaving the substantive issue for judicial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:16:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 582 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96301</link>
      <description>The commentary addresses whether Modvat credit could be extended on documents not prescribed under Rule 57G and whether that legal question warranted reference to the High Court. The stated outcome is that the matter was referred to the High Court for determination of the question of law, leaving the substantive issue for judicial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>