<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 505 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96294</link>
    <description>Where a Customs House Agent licence is governed by a notification prescribing five-year validity, the authority cannot shorten that period by refusing renewal on performance grounds without legal basis. The text states that a licence renewed up to 31-12-1994 should have remained valid up to 31-12-1999 under the governing notification, and that the denial of renewal beyond the shorter period was unsustainable. The stated consequence was that renewal was due up to 31-12-1999 and the contrary order was set aside to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 505 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96294</link>
      <description>Where a Customs House Agent licence is governed by a notification prescribing five-year validity, the authority cannot shorten that period by refusing renewal on performance grounds without legal basis. The text states that a licence renewed up to 31-12-1994 should have remained valid up to 31-12-1999 under the governing notification, and that the denial of renewal beyond the shorter period was unsustainable. The stated consequence was that renewal was due up to 31-12-1999 and the contrary order was set aside to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>