<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 542 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim concerning the classification of the imported product &quot;Glasticord 450&quot; as synthetic rubber under Customs Chapter Heading 40.02 or 40.05. The authorities&#039; decision was supported by the lack of challenge to the initial classification as a sealant, insufficient evidence to prove the product as synthetic rubber, and the product&#039;s function as a sealant based on documentation and test results. The appellant&#039;s reliance on product literature and judicial precedents was deemed insufficient to overturn the authorities&#039; findings, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 542 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim concerning the classification of the imported product &quot;Glasticord 450&quot; as synthetic rubber under Customs Chapter Heading 40.02 or 40.05. The authorities&#039; decision was supported by the lack of challenge to the initial classification as a sealant, insufficient evidence to prove the product as synthetic rubber, and the product&#039;s function as a sealant based on documentation and test results. The appellant&#039;s reliance on product literature and judicial precedents was deemed insufficient to overturn the authorities&#039; findings, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>