<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 593 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96270</link>
    <description>Related-person valuation under excise law cannot be sustained unless the revenue proves direct or indirect mutual interest in each other&#039;s business. A common tenancy of premises and transfer of rent to capital account, without more, is insufficient to establish the required relationship. The record also indicated sales to independent buyers at a discount, supporting the assessee&#039;s claimed discount structure. On these facts, the retail-price-based valuation adopted against the assessee failed, and the duty demand and personal penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:06:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 593 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96270</link>
      <description>Related-person valuation under excise law cannot be sustained unless the revenue proves direct or indirect mutual interest in each other&#039;s business. A common tenancy of premises and transfer of rent to capital account, without more, is insufficient to establish the required relationship. The record also indicated sales to independent buyers at a discount, supporting the assessee&#039;s claimed discount structure. On these facts, the retail-price-based valuation adopted against the assessee failed, and the duty demand and personal penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>