<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 592 - cegat, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96269</link>
    <description>Orders determining annual production capacity were set aside because they were stereotyped and mechanically filled in, showing lack of application of mind and failure to meaningfully consider the appellants&#039; representations. The disposal was found inconsistent with natural justice, as the Commissioner had not properly dealt with the relevant pleas. Fresh redetermination was therefore required, with notice to the appellants and an to produce supporting documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 592 - cegat, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96269</link>
      <description>Orders determining annual production capacity were set aside because they were stereotyped and mechanically filled in, showing lack of application of mind and failure to meaningfully consider the appellants&#039; representations. The disposal was found inconsistent with natural justice, as the Commissioner had not properly dealt with the relevant pleas. Fresh redetermination was therefore required, with notice to the appellants and an to produce supporting documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>