https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96267 The appeal was rejected except for the reduction in penalty and setting aside of the demand for the months of July 1988 and August 1989. The classification of the special yarn under Heading No. 56.06 was upheld, and the demand for central excise duty was confirmed for the yarn manufactured on the Saurer Allma Machine. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 3 lakhs to Rs. 2.5 lakhs, and the redemption fine of Rs. 50,000/- was maintained. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:52:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96267 The appeal was rejected except for the reduction in penalty and setting aside of the demand for the months of July 1988 and August 1989. The classification of the special yarn under Heading No. 56.06 was upheld, and the demand for central excise duty was confirmed for the yarn manufactured on the Saurer Allma Machine. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 3 lakhs to Rs. 2.5 lakhs, and the redemption fine of Rs. 50,000/- was maintained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96267