https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96266 The earlier Tribunal direction confined reconsideration to Indrox 985 P-12, so its classification had to be re-examined with reference to the technical literature and HSN Explanatory Notes. By contrast, the classification of Indrox 9 PR-12 was not covered by that limited reconsideration and had attained finality under Heading 3204.30. The order therefore directed implementation of the earlier appellate and Tribunal directions, with reconsideration restricted to Indrox 985 P-12 and the classification of Indrox 9 PR-12 treated as concluded. en-us Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:50:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96266 The earlier Tribunal direction confined reconsideration to Indrox 985 P-12, so its classification had to be re-examined with reference to the technical literature and HSN Explanatory Notes. By contrast, the classification of Indrox 9 PR-12 was not covered by that limited reconsideration and had attained finality under Heading 3204.30. The order therefore directed implementation of the earlier appellate and Tribunal directions, with reconsideration restricted to Indrox 985 P-12 and the classification of Indrox 9 PR-12 treated as concluded. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96266