<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 448 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal treated an identical question of law on the applicability of penalty and confiscation provisions to goods covered by the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 as fit for reference. Noting that the Gujarat High Court had already taken that view in another matter, and that the assessees were within the Bombay High Court&#039;s jurisdiction, it declined final adjudication and referred the question to the jurisdictional High Court for decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 448 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal treated an identical question of law on the applicability of penalty and confiscation provisions to goods covered by the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 as fit for reference. Noting that the Gujarat High Court had already taken that view in another matter, and that the assessees were within the Bombay High Court&#039;s jurisdiction, it declined final adjudication and referred the question to the jurisdictional High Court for decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>