<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 280 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Vaibhav Textiles regarding the acceptance of transaction value for Customs duty assessment. The Tribunal found that the goods imported by other entities differed significantly from those of the appellants in terms of characteristics and quality, making them unsuitable for comparison. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s decision to enhance the value based on different imports, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering similar goods with like characteristics for valuation purposes. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal accepted the transaction value declared by M/s. Vaibhav Textiles for Customs duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 280 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Vaibhav Textiles regarding the acceptance of transaction value for Customs duty assessment. The Tribunal found that the goods imported by other entities differed significantly from those of the appellants in terms of characteristics and quality, making them unsuitable for comparison. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s decision to enhance the value based on different imports, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering similar goods with like characteristics for valuation purposes. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal accepted the transaction value declared by M/s. Vaibhav Textiles for Customs duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>