<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96229</link>
    <description>Off-loading hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid from tankers into smaller cylinders, even with labelling, was treated as mere decanting rather than repacking from bulk packs into retail packs. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that such transfer does not attract the deeming fiction of manufacture under Note 10 of Chapter 28 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On that basis, the activity was regarded as not amounting to manufacture, and the appellants were held to have a prima facie case for unconditional stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:07:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96229</link>
      <description>Off-loading hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid from tankers into smaller cylinders, even with labelling, was treated as mere decanting rather than repacking from bulk packs into retail packs. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that such transfer does not attract the deeming fiction of manufacture under Note 10 of Chapter 28 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On that basis, the activity was regarded as not amounting to manufacture, and the appellants were held to have a prima facie case for unconditional stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>