<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 309 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs&#039; jurisdiction in addressing violations of post-importation conditions specified in the Import Policy, reducing penalties and setting aside redemption fines for certain parties. It found that the transfer of second-hand knitting machines without DGFT permission constituted a technical infringement, not a violation of the Customs Act. Buyers were deemed bona fide purchasers and not liable for penal action. The Tribunal concluded that the penalties and fines were adjusted accordingly, disposing of the appeals in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 309 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs&#039; jurisdiction in addressing violations of post-importation conditions specified in the Import Policy, reducing penalties and setting aside redemption fines for certain parties. It found that the transfer of second-hand knitting machines without DGFT permission constituted a technical infringement, not a violation of the Customs Act. Buyers were deemed bona fide purchasers and not liable for penal action. The Tribunal concluded that the penalties and fines were adjusted accordingly, disposing of the appeals in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>