https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96208 Commissioner (Appeals) was treated as having prima facie power to modify an order of absolute confiscation by permitting redemption on payment of fine, because appellate jurisdiction under Section 128A extends to confirming, modifying or annulling the adjudicating authority's decision. The objection that Section 125 power rests only with the adjudicating authority was kept for regular hearing and was not accepted as a basis for interim relief. On that footing, the department's request for stay of the appellate order was rejected and the matter was directed to be listed for early hearing. en-us Thu, 24 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:53:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96208 Commissioner (Appeals) was treated as having prima facie power to modify an order of absolute confiscation by permitting redemption on payment of fine, because appellate jurisdiction under Section 128A extends to confirming, modifying or annulling the adjudicating authority's decision. The objection that Section 125 power rests only with the adjudicating authority was kept for regular hearing and was not accepted as a basis for interim relief. On that footing, the department's request for stay of the appellate order was rejected and the matter was directed to be listed for early hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96208