<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96200</link>
    <description>Valuation under the excise rules cannot be shifted to comparable goods where excisable goods are sold to an independent buyer at open auction for the sole consideration of price and the transaction value is available and has not been rejected. In that situation, the actual sale price remains the proper basis for assessment, so a differential duty demand founded on comparable prices is unsustainable. Because the penalty depended on the same valuation basis, it also fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96200</link>
      <description>Valuation under the excise rules cannot be shifted to comparable goods where excisable goods are sold to an independent buyer at open auction for the sole consideration of price and the transaction value is available and has not been rejected. In that situation, the actual sale price remains the proper basis for assessment, so a differential duty demand founded on comparable prices is unsustainable. Because the penalty depended on the same valuation basis, it also fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>