<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 358 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96167</link>
    <description>A copolymer predominantly composed of acrylic monomer and partly of styrene monomer was treated as classifiable under heading 3906.90 as an acrylic polymer, and that classification supported exemption eligibility under Notification No. 14/92. The phrase &quot;based on&quot; in the exemption entry was held not to mean &quot;consisting of&quot;, so the absence of any vinyl monomer did not by itself defeat relief where the goods otherwise matched the notified description and tariff heading. On that basis, the copolymer qualified as a copolymer resin emulsion based on acrylic and/or vinyl monomer, and the exemption was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 358 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96167</link>
      <description>A copolymer predominantly composed of acrylic monomer and partly of styrene monomer was treated as classifiable under heading 3906.90 as an acrylic polymer, and that classification supported exemption eligibility under Notification No. 14/92. The phrase &quot;based on&quot; in the exemption entry was held not to mean &quot;consisting of&quot;, so the absence of any vinyl monomer did not by itself defeat relief where the goods otherwise matched the notified description and tariff heading. On that basis, the copolymer qualified as a copolymer resin emulsion based on acrylic and/or vinyl monomer, and the exemption was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>