<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 345 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the Line Testing Unit (LTU) is eligible for the benefit under Notification No. 73/90 as an integral component of the Rural Automatic Exchange (RAX), despite arguments that it was merely an optional accessory. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging this decision emphasized the need for a detailed examination to ascertain the LTU&#039;s status as part of the RAX. Due to a discrepancy in the purchase order, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity for clarification on the LTU&#039;s role. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for de novo adjudication by the original authority to ensure a thorough evaluation of the LTU&#039;s eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 345 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the Line Testing Unit (LTU) is eligible for the benefit under Notification No. 73/90 as an integral component of the Rural Automatic Exchange (RAX), despite arguments that it was merely an optional accessory. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging this decision emphasized the need for a detailed examination to ascertain the LTU&#039;s status as part of the RAX. Due to a discrepancy in the purchase order, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity for clarification on the LTU&#039;s role. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for de novo adjudication by the original authority to ensure a thorough evaluation of the LTU&#039;s eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>