https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96127 A claim involving unjust enrichment was remanded because the Tribunal accepted that, where the product's price structure remains unchanged after a duty increase, it may not be possible to infer that the duty incidence was passed on to customers. Applying that line of authority, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed fresh reconsideration by the original authority on unjust enrichment in light of the cited decisions. en-us Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:58:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96127 A claim involving unjust enrichment was remanded because the Tribunal accepted that, where the product's price structure remains unchanged after a duty increase, it may not be possible to infer that the duty incidence was passed on to customers. Applying that line of authority, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed fresh reconsideration by the original authority on unjust enrichment in light of the cited decisions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96127