<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96117</link>
    <description>Processed piled acrylic fabrics in running length were held not to be marketable as a distinct commercial commodity, because the record did not show that the intermediate product was understood in trade or possessed independent character as goods. Applying the same principle used in the comparable processed knitted fabrics matter, the article had already acquired the essential characteristics of blankets, so the intermediate stage could not be treated as excisable merely because it could later be cut into blankets. Classification under Heading 60.01 and the duty demand therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s non-liability remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96117</link>
      <description>Processed piled acrylic fabrics in running length were held not to be marketable as a distinct commercial commodity, because the record did not show that the intermediate product was understood in trade or possessed independent character as goods. Applying the same principle used in the comparable processed knitted fabrics matter, the article had already acquired the essential characteristics of blankets, so the intermediate stage could not be treated as excisable merely because it could later be cut into blankets. Classification under Heading 60.01 and the duty demand therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s non-liability remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>