<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 436 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96103</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal of the Central Excise Commissioner, Mumbai, and allowed the appeal of the appellant on the ground of time bar for the duty demands related to differential duty demands on Audio Cassettes. The judgment directed consequential relief to be provided to the assessees in line with the decision, emphasizing the absence of evidence supporting the duty demands and the transparency in pricing demonstrated by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 436 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96103</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal of the Central Excise Commissioner, Mumbai, and allowed the appeal of the appellant on the ground of time bar for the duty demands related to differential duty demands on Audio Cassettes. The judgment directed consequential relief to be provided to the assessees in line with the decision, emphasizing the absence of evidence supporting the duty demands and the transparency in pricing demonstrated by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>