<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 434 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the seized goods due to mis-declaration in the Shipping Bill by the appellants, engaged in Zinc Oxide export. The appellants failed to produce the entire declared quantity, indicating fraudulent intent to claim higher duty drawback. While the penalty was reduced from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs, the confiscation was maintained based on legal provisions and the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 434 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the seized goods due to mis-declaration in the Shipping Bill by the appellants, engaged in Zinc Oxide export. The appellants failed to produce the entire declared quantity, indicating fraudulent intent to claim higher duty drawback. While the penalty was reduced from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs, the confiscation was maintained based on legal provisions and the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>