https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96092 The Commissioner's classification of goods under Heading 8421.00 was upheld, rejecting the appellants' claim for classification under sub-heading 4410.90. The Commissioner's use of phrases implying misstatement by the appellants was found unjustified by the Tribunal, leading to the deletion of such language from the order. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, supporting the removal of the objectionable phrases from the Commissioner's decision. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:08:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96092 The Commissioner's classification of goods under Heading 8421.00 was upheld, rejecting the appellants' claim for classification under sub-heading 4410.90. The Commissioner's use of phrases implying misstatement by the appellants was found unjustified by the Tribunal, leading to the deletion of such language from the order. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, supporting the removal of the objectionable phrases from the Commissioner's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96092