https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96089 Benefit under Notification No. 24/92 could not be denied merely because the certificate was signed by the Joint Director and countersigned by the Director. The certificate satisfied the requirement in substance, and the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same point. The objection to the notification benefit was therefore rejected, and the denial was held unsustainable. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:59:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96089 Benefit under Notification No. 24/92 could not be denied merely because the certificate was signed by the Joint Director and countersigned by the Director. The certificate satisfied the requirement in substance, and the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same point. The objection to the notification benefit was therefore rejected, and the denial was held unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96089