<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 522 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96062</link>
    <description>A Customs House Agent licence rejection was set aside because it was decided without a reasonable opportunity of hearing and on extraneous matters unrelated to the pending application. The decision also ignored binding remand directions and was inconsistent with the licensing scheme under Regulation 16 of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the Commissioner, with the applicant to be heard before any new decision is taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:44:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 522 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96062</link>
      <description>A Customs House Agent licence rejection was set aside because it was decided without a reasonable opportunity of hearing and on extraneous matters unrelated to the pending application. The decision also ignored binding remand directions and was inconsistent with the licensing scheme under Regulation 16 of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the Commissioner, with the applicant to be heard before any new decision is taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>