<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 611 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96046</link>
    <description>Rejected wheels and axles arising during machining were treated as waste and scrap because they had not reached the stage of complete manufacture or identifiable use as railway rolling stock components. Mere partial machining did not make them fully manufactured wheels or axles when the goods were cleared as rejected material and were unfit for the intended purpose. The classification therefore fell under the tariff entry for waste and scrap rather than the entry for wheels and axles, with Note 6(a) of Section XV supporting that approach. The lower appellate classification was set aside and the assessee&#039;s contention succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 611 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96046</link>
      <description>Rejected wheels and axles arising during machining were treated as waste and scrap because they had not reached the stage of complete manufacture or identifiable use as railway rolling stock components. Mere partial machining did not make them fully manufactured wheels or axles when the goods were cleared as rejected material and were unfit for the intended purpose. The classification therefore fell under the tariff entry for waste and scrap rather than the entry for wheels and axles, with Note 6(a) of Section XV supporting that approach. The lower appellate classification was set aside and the assessee&#039;s contention succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>