<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 608 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96043</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 46/85-Cus. applied to imported horological brass strips because the notification and chapter notes did not define leaded brass strips in a way that excluded goods with only incidental lead content. Mere presence of lead was held insufficient to reclassify the goods as leaded brass strips without clear legal or factual basis, especially where the customs authorities relied on presumption and prior imports had been accepted under the same description. Compliance with the certificate requirement was also on record, and the later denial of the exemption was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 608 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96043</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 46/85-Cus. applied to imported horological brass strips because the notification and chapter notes did not define leaded brass strips in a way that excluded goods with only incidental lead content. Mere presence of lead was held insufficient to reclassify the goods as leaded brass strips without clear legal or factual basis, especially where the customs authorities relied on presumption and prior imports had been accepted under the same description. Compliance with the certificate requirement was also on record, and the later denial of the exemption was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>