<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 227 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96031</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission allowed the applicant&#039;s application for settlement of a case involving mis-declaration of goods at Bangalore International Airport, despite objections from the Revenue regarding non-filing of a Bill of Entry. The Commission emphasized the importance of full disclosure of duty liability and accepted the determined value offered by the applicant. The Commission invoked its exclusive jurisdiction under Section 127F of the Customs Act, 1962, to handle the case and directed the adjustment of the admitted amount from the sale proceeds of the goods, in line with the purpose of providing a chance for tax-evaders to rectify their actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 227 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96031</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission allowed the applicant&#039;s application for settlement of a case involving mis-declaration of goods at Bangalore International Airport, despite objections from the Revenue regarding non-filing of a Bill of Entry. The Commission emphasized the importance of full disclosure of duty liability and accepted the determined value offered by the applicant. The Commission invoked its exclusive jurisdiction under Section 127F of the Customs Act, 1962, to handle the case and directed the adjustment of the admitted amount from the sale proceeds of the goods, in line with the purpose of providing a chance for tax-evaders to rectify their actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>