<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96022</link>
    <description>Weigh bridges and M.S. gratings used in a 100% export-oriented unit were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 123/81-C.E. because they were used in connection with the manufacture of the final products. The M.S. gratings served as stair structures linking different floors, and the weigh bridges were used to weigh incoming and outgoing consignments. The Tribunal followed its earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case and the Larger Bench ruling relied on there. The exemption was held admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:35:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96022</link>
      <description>Weigh bridges and M.S. gratings used in a 100% export-oriented unit were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 123/81-C.E. because they were used in connection with the manufacture of the final products. The M.S. gratings served as stair structures linking different floors, and the weigh bridges were used to weigh incoming and outgoing consignments. The Tribunal followed its earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case and the Larger Bench ruling relied on there. The exemption was held admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>