https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96019 Omission to cite an earlier Tribunal decision did not, by itself, make the final order a nullity or create an error apparent from the face of the record. A rectification or recall application is maintainable only where the record discloses a patent mistake; a mere overlooked precedent does not justify reopening the order. The cited authorities were treated as supporting rejection of recall in the absence of any apparent error, and the rectification application was rejected. en-us Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:22:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96019 Omission to cite an earlier Tribunal decision did not, by itself, make the final order a nullity or create an error apparent from the face of the record. A rectification or recall application is maintainable only where the record discloses a patent mistake; a mere overlooked precedent does not justify reopening the order. The cited authorities were treated as supporting rejection of recall in the absence of any apparent error, and the rectification application was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96019