<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 267 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96003</link>
    <description>For exemption under Notification No. 1/93 based on &quot;first clearances&quot;, the relevant reckoning point is the commencement of the financial year. Clearances made earlier in the year must be counted even if the manufacturer exercises the option to avail the notification later in that same year. The expression &quot;first clearances&quot; was read as referring to clearances from the start of the financial year, so later election does not permit exclusion of prior clearances. The departmental view was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 267 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96003</link>
      <description>For exemption under Notification No. 1/93 based on &quot;first clearances&quot;, the relevant reckoning point is the commencement of the financial year. Clearances made earlier in the year must be counted even if the manufacturer exercises the option to avail the notification later in that same year. The expression &quot;first clearances&quot; was read as referring to clearances from the start of the financial year, so later election does not permit exclusion of prior clearances. The departmental view was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>