<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96000</link>
    <description>A remand in a crane classification dispute was left undisturbed because the earlier precedent relied on by the adjudicating authority had since been set aside and a larger bench decision was available for consideration. The tribunal held that, in these circumstances, interference with the remand order was not warranted. It directed the authority on remand to decide the classification afresh after considering the relevant Board circular, the larger bench decision, and other applicable case law within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96000</link>
      <description>A remand in a crane classification dispute was left undisturbed because the earlier precedent relied on by the adjudicating authority had since been set aside and a larger bench decision was available for consideration. The tribunal held that, in these circumstances, interference with the remand order was not warranted. It directed the authority on remand to decide the classification afresh after considering the relevant Board circular, the larger bench decision, and other applicable case law within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>