<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 378 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95989</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order. The Tribunal excluded advertising expenses from the assessable value of processed fabrics, emphasizing prior Supreme Court decisions. It highlighted discrepancies in the duty demand clarification and rejected the imposition based on the relationship between sellers and buyers. The Tribunal clarified the definition of &quot;related person&quot; and emphasized the need for a familial connection. Ultimately, the Tribunal found the duty demand and penalties unsustainable, ensuring a just outcome based on legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 378 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95989</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order. The Tribunal excluded advertising expenses from the assessable value of processed fabrics, emphasizing prior Supreme Court decisions. It highlighted discrepancies in the duty demand clarification and rejected the imposition based on the relationship between sellers and buyers. The Tribunal clarified the definition of &quot;related person&quot; and emphasized the need for a familial connection. Ultimately, the Tribunal found the duty demand and penalties unsustainable, ensuring a just outcome based on legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>