https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95987 The Tribunal treated the tariff classification issue as already settled in earlier proceedings, where the assessee's classification of sintered steel and copper products under sub-heading 7308.90 and 7413.90 had been accepted. On that basis, the departmental view classifying the goods under sub-heading 84.83 could not be sustained, because the duty demands depended on a classification position that had already been displaced by the earlier Tribunal ruling. The duty demands were therefore set aside and the appeals succeeded. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:53:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95987 The Tribunal treated the tariff classification issue as already settled in earlier proceedings, where the assessee's classification of sintered steel and copper products under sub-heading 7308.90 and 7413.90 had been accepted. On that basis, the departmental view classifying the goods under sub-heading 84.83 could not be sustained, because the duty demands depended on a classification position that had already been displaced by the earlier Tribunal ruling. The duty demands were therefore set aside and the appeals succeeded. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95987