https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95985 Nylon monofilament used captively in making nylon tufts was treated as a dutiable intermediate product because it was marketable and fell within the tariff classification already settled by binding precedent. The Tribunal relied on its earlier final ruling on synthetic monofilament and found no distinct ground to depart from that ratio. On that basis, it held that the duty demand on the captively consumed monofilament was legally sustainable and rejected the appeal. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:44:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95985 Nylon monofilament used captively in making nylon tufts was treated as a dutiable intermediate product because it was marketable and fell within the tariff classification already settled by binding precedent. The Tribunal relied on its earlier final ruling on synthetic monofilament and found no distinct ground to depart from that ratio. On that basis, it held that the duty demand on the captively consumed monofilament was legally sustainable and rejected the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95985