https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95943 An appellate court should interfere with an acquittal only where the trial court's findings are perverse, manifestly erroneous, demonstrably unsustainable, or based on omission to consider material evidence. The presumption of innocence is strengthened by acquittal, so appellate review must be cautious and the conviction standard is not met unless the evidence gives absolute assurance of guilt. On the facts and reasons recorded, the trial court's view was cogent and convincing, and no patent illegality or untenable conclusion was shown; the acquittal therefore stood and the appeal failed. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:51:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95943 An appellate court should interfere with an acquittal only where the trial court's findings are perverse, manifestly erroneous, demonstrably unsustainable, or based on omission to consider material evidence. The presumption of innocence is strengthened by acquittal, so appellate review must be cautious and the conviction standard is not met unless the evidence gives absolute assurance of guilt. On the facts and reasons recorded, the trial court's view was cogent and convincing, and no patent illegality or untenable conclusion was shown; the acquittal therefore stood and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95943