https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95907 Condonation of delay was refused because the applicant did not satisfactorily explain an extended delay in filing an appeal after being advised to obtain a speaking order and file a fresh appeal. The unsigned status of the impugned order, alleged uncertainty over the issuing authority, and concern about parallel appeals against the same cause of action did not justify inaction. An earlier appeal against a note-sheet order had been treated as non-maintainable; the required course was to secure a speaking order and challenge it promptly. The appeal was consequently dismissed following rejection of the condonation application. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:33:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95907 Condonation of delay was refused because the applicant did not satisfactorily explain an extended delay in filing an appeal after being advised to obtain a speaking order and file a fresh appeal. The unsigned status of the impugned order, alleged uncertainty over the issuing authority, and concern about parallel appeals against the same cause of action did not justify inaction. An earlier appeal against a note-sheet order had been treated as non-maintainable; the required course was to secure a speaking order and challenge it promptly. The appeal was consequently dismissed following rejection of the condonation application. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95907