https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95884 An application seeking restoration of an earlier restoration application was held not maintainable because the Act and Rules do not provide for restoring a dismissed restoration request. The Tribunal also noted that the appeal had already been dismissed for failure to comply with the pre-deposit direction under the statutory consequence provision, after the deposit direction had been upheld and time extended. A belated attempt to reopen that concluded dismissal was refused, and a fax seeking adjournment on the ground of counsel's illness was not accepted as sufficient reason to grant relief. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:21:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95884 An application seeking restoration of an earlier restoration application was held not maintainable because the Act and Rules do not provide for restoring a dismissed restoration request. The Tribunal also noted that the appeal had already been dismissed for failure to comply with the pre-deposit direction under the statutory consequence provision, after the deposit direction had been upheld and time extended. A belated attempt to reopen that concluded dismissal was refused, and a fax seeking adjournment on the ground of counsel's illness was not accepted as sufficient reason to grant relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95884