https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95873 The Tribunal rejected the appeals and cross-objections concerning the determination of annual capacity of production of induction furnaces. The delay in filing appeals was not condoned, leading to dismissal due to exceeding the permitted time. The order communicated on 22-5-2000 was deemed not appealable as a prior final order had been issued in 1998. Revisiting the same issue before the Tribunal was not allowed, emphasizing the principle against agitating the same matter twice. Full disclosure of facts to the High Court was stressed for transparency. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95873 The Tribunal rejected the appeals and cross-objections concerning the determination of annual capacity of production of induction furnaces. The delay in filing appeals was not condoned, leading to dismissal due to exceeding the permitted time. The order communicated on 22-5-2000 was deemed not appealable as a prior final order had been issued in 1998. Revisiting the same issue before the Tribunal was not allowed, emphasizing the principle against agitating the same matter twice. Full disclosure of facts to the High Court was stressed for transparency. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95873