<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 580 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the confiscation of betel nuts and trucks as unjustified due to insufficient proof of foreign origin and smuggling. Personal penalties imposed on various persons were also deemed unwarranted, leading to relief granted to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of positive evidence for establishing illegal importation, highlighting the lack of substantial proof in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 580 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the confiscation of betel nuts and trucks as unjustified due to insufficient proof of foreign origin and smuggling. Personal penalties imposed on various persons were also deemed unwarranted, leading to relief granted to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of positive evidence for establishing illegal importation, highlighting the lack of substantial proof in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>