<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 579 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95871</link>
    <description>An uncorroborated statement of a driver, unsupported by independent evidence, was held insufficient to sustain a personal penalty against the truck owner, and the penalty was deleted. In relation to confiscation of the truck under the Customs Act, the vehicle remained in the recorded owner&#039;s name and there was no showing that the owner was involved in transporting the contraband; confiscation was therefore upheld. However, the redemption fine was found excessive on the facts and was reduced to a token amount. The note confirms that adverse penal consequences require reliable supporting evidence, while confiscation may still stand where statutory conditions are met, subject to proportionality in the fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 579 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95871</link>
      <description>An uncorroborated statement of a driver, unsupported by independent evidence, was held insufficient to sustain a personal penalty against the truck owner, and the penalty was deleted. In relation to confiscation of the truck under the Customs Act, the vehicle remained in the recorded owner&#039;s name and there was no showing that the owner was involved in transporting the contraband; confiscation was therefore upheld. However, the redemption fine was found excessive on the facts and was reduced to a token amount. The note confirms that adverse penal consequences require reliable supporting evidence, while confiscation may still stand where statutory conditions are met, subject to proportionality in the fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>