<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 569 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95861</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed duty confirmation and penalties against the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of goods under second gate passes. It noted the failure of natural justice in not considering the appellant&#039;s detailed reply, leading to a non-speaking order. The appellant&#039;s concerns about procedural fairness were upheld, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, stressing the importance of upholding principles of natural justice and providing all parties with a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 569 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95861</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed duty confirmation and penalties against the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of goods under second gate passes. It noted the failure of natural justice in not considering the appellant&#039;s detailed reply, leading to a non-speaking order. The appellant&#039;s concerns about procedural fairness were upheld, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, stressing the importance of upholding principles of natural justice and providing all parties with a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>