<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 532 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95851</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of goods as integral shaft bearings or water pump bearings under Heading 84.82 of the tariff, rejecting the department&#039;s argument to classify them as parts of internal combustion engines under Heading 84.09. The Tribunal emphasized the goods&#039; primary function as bearings to reduce friction and provide support, citing manufacturer literature indicating diverse applications beyond internal combustion engines. Despite recognizing the shaft&#039;s role in engine operation, the Tribunal concluded that the goods should be classified as bearings, dismissing the department&#039;s appeals and affirming the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 532 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95851</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of goods as integral shaft bearings or water pump bearings under Heading 84.82 of the tariff, rejecting the department&#039;s argument to classify them as parts of internal combustion engines under Heading 84.09. The Tribunal emphasized the goods&#039; primary function as bearings to reduce friction and provide support, citing manufacturer literature indicating diverse applications beyond internal combustion engines. Despite recognizing the shaft&#039;s role in engine operation, the Tribunal concluded that the goods should be classified as bearings, dismissing the department&#039;s appeals and affirming the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>