https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95840 A stay application seeking suspension of an appellate valuation order was rejected because no prima facie error was found in the impugned order. The revenue's interest was already protected by a bond and bank guarantee covering the differential duty arising from the import valuation dispute, and the goods had been cleared. On that basis, there was no sufficient ground to grant stay, and the application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:21:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95840 A stay application seeking suspension of an appellate valuation order was rejected because no prima facie error was found in the impugned order. The revenue's interest was already protected by a bond and bank guarantee covering the differential duty arising from the import valuation dispute, and the goods had been cleared. On that basis, there was no sufficient ground to grant stay, and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95840